Featured
Table of Contents
Both propose to get rid of the capability to "forum shop" by omitting a debtor's location of incorporation from the location analysis, andalarming to global debtorsexcluding money or money equivalents from the "primary properties" formula. In addition, any equity interest in an affiliate will be considered located in the exact same place as the principal.
Typically, this testimony has been focused on controversial third party release arrangements executed in current mass tort cases such as Purdue Pharma, Young Boy Scouts of America, and numerous Catholic diocese personal bankruptcies. These arrangements often require financial institutions to release non-debtor 3rd parties as part of the debtor's plan of reorganization, even though such releases are probably not allowed, at least in some circuits, by the Personal bankruptcy Code.
Why 2026 Personal Bankruptcy Code Updates Advantage the DebtorIn effort to stamp out this behavior, the proposed legislation claims to restrict "online forum shopping" by restricting entities from filing in any venue other than where their corporate headquarters or principal physical assetsexcluding cash and equity interestsare situated. Seemingly, these bills would promote the filing of Chapter 11 cases in other US districts, and steer cases far from the preferred courts in New York, Delaware and Texas.
Regardless of their laudable purpose, these proposed changes could have unforeseen and possibly adverse effects when viewed from a global restructuring potential. While congressional testament and other commentators presume that location reform would simply ensure that domestic business would submit in a different jurisdiction within the US, it is an unique possibility that global debtors might hand down the United States Bankruptcy Courts completely.
Without the consideration of cash accounts as an opportunity towards eligibility, lots of foreign corporations without tangible possessions in the US might not qualify to submit a Chapter 11 insolvency in any US jurisdiction. Second, even if they do qualify, global debtors might not have the ability to depend on access to the typical and practical reorganization friendly jurisdictions.
Provided the intricate concerns frequently at play in an international restructuring case, this might trigger the debtor and lenders some uncertainty. This uncertainty, in turn, might encourage international debtors to submit in their own countries, or in other more advantageous countries, instead. Significantly, this proposed place reform comes at a time when many countries are replicating the US and revamping their own restructuring laws.
In a departure from their previous restructuring system which emphasized liquidation, the new Code's goal is to reorganize and preserve the entity as a going concern. Thus, debt restructuring agreements may be approved with just 30 percent approval from the general financial obligation. However, unlike the United States, Italy's brand-new Code will not include an automated stay of enforcement actions by financial institutions.
In February of 2021, a Canadian court extended the nation's approval of third party release provisions. In Canada, businesses generally restructure under the conventional insolvency statutes of the Companies' Financial Institutions Arrangement Act (). Third celebration releases under the CCAAwhile hotly contested in the USare a common aspect of restructuring strategies.
The recent court decision makes clear, though, that in spite of the CBCA's more minimal nature, third party release arrangements might still be acceptable. Companies may still avail themselves of a less cumbersome restructuring readily available under the CBCA, while still receiving the benefits of third celebration releases. Effective as of January 1, 2021, the Dutch Act Upon Court Confirmation of Extrajudicial Restructuring Plans has developed a debtor-in-possession treatment carried out outside of official bankruptcy procedures.
Effective as of January 1, 2021, Germany's new Act on the Stabilization and Restructuring Framework for Businesses offers for pre-insolvency restructuring procedures. Prior to its enactment, German business had no choice to reorganize their debts through the courts. Now, distressed companies can hire German courts to restructure their financial obligations and otherwise preserve the going issue value of their company by utilizing a number of the very same tools readily available in the US, such as keeping control of their organization, imposing stuff down restructuring plans, and executing collection moratoriums.
Influenced by Chapter 11 of the United States Personal Bankruptcy Code, this brand-new structure streamlines the debtor-in-possession restructuring process mainly in effort to help small and medium sized organizations. While prior law was long slammed as too costly and too complex because of its "one size fits all" method, this brand-new legislation includes the debtor in ownership model, and provides for a structured liquidation process when needed In June 2020, the United Kingdom enacted the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act of 2020 ().
Significantly, CIGA offers a collection moratorium, revokes specific arrangements of pre-insolvency contracts, and allows entities to propose a plan with investors and lenders, all of which permits the development of a cram-down strategy comparable to what might be achieved under Chapter 11 of the US Insolvency Code. In 2017, Singapore embraced enacted the Companies (Change) Act 2017 (Singapore), which made significant legal modifications to the restructuring arrangements of the Singapore Companies Act (Cap 50) 2006.
As a result, the law has actually significantly improved the restructuring tools offered in Singapore courts and propelled Singapore as a leading hub for insolvency in the Asia-Pacific. In Might of 2016, India enacted the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, which totally upgraded the bankruptcy laws in India. This legislation looks for to incentivize more investment in the nation by supplying greater certainty and efficiency to the restructuring procedure.
Given these recent changes, international debtors now have more alternatives than ever. Even without the proposed limitations on eligibility, foreign entities may less need to flock to the US as before. Even more, should the United States' location laws be modified to prevent simple filings in specific convenient and helpful locations, worldwide debtors may begin to consider other locales.
Unique thanks to Dallas associate Michael Berthiaume who prepared and authored this content under the supervision of Rebecca Winthrop, Of Counsel in our Los Angeles workplace.
Customer bankruptcy filings increased 9% in January 2026 compared to January 2025, with 44,282 customer filings that month alone. Commercial filings jumped 49% year-over-year the highest January level since 2018. The numbers show what debt experts call "slow-burn monetary strain" that's been constructing for years. If you're having a hard time, you're not an outlier.
Why 2026 Personal Bankruptcy Code Updates Advantage the DebtorConsumer personal bankruptcy filings totaled 44,282 in January 2026, up 9% from January 2025. Business filings hit 1,378 a 49% year-over-year dive and the highest January business filing level given that 2018. For all of 2025, consumer filings grew almost 14%. (Source: Law360 Insolvency Authority)44,282 Customer Filings in Jan 2026 +9%Year-Over-Year Boost +49%Business Filings YoY +14%Consumer Filings All of 2025 January 2026 insolvency filings: 44,282 consumer, 1,378 commercial the greatest January commercial level because 2018 Professionals priced estimate by Law360 explain the trend as reflecting "slow-burn monetary pressure." That's a refined way of saying what I've been looking for years: people do not snap economically overnight.
Latest Posts
Essential Tips for Seeking Pre-Bankruptcy Counseling in 2026
Top Tips for Seeking Pre-Bankruptcy Counseling in 2026
Proven Methods to Negotiate Debt in 2026


